Just read this.

[Sited]

I don't know where to post this other than the IDK.

The actions of groups around the world, particularly on September 11th 2001 and July the 7th a few years ago here at home; groups who crown themselves with pride with their belief that they fight for Muslims have resulted a global sense of fear and thus, understandably, hate for what many consider threats to their way of life if not their life itself. What isn't talked about much is exactly the effect this is had on the general Muslim population, what people sometimes forget is that more Muslims have died through such attacks than anyone else, what you dont often hear about is how a Muslim woman has her scarf pulled off and be kicked off the bus in London whilst passengers either sit in silence of giggle with restraint, or how Sikh taxi drivers were murdered simply because their Dastaar's (Turbans) and long beards were mistaken for Muslim characteristics. Despite being the major reference point for debates; the attacks by Al Qaeda in 2001 were not the only such assaults on innocent persons in recent years. To the contrary, those attacks seemed to have a great deal in common with religiously themed violence that has spread across most major faith systems. There is religiously motivated violence by both Jewish and Muslim groups in the Middle East, and there are religious groups that advocate violence in the namae of the Christianity in the United States. What cannot be in doubt however, is the majority of them are done so in the name of Islam.

One common motivator of religious violence is what sociologists and political scientists call a totalist out-look on life. This is essentially the belief that one's own cause is entirely good, and the cause of one's opponents entirely bad. Totalism can also be described as the belief that a single narrow set of ideas can and should permeate all of society, eradicating all ideas that oppose it, both in their practice and existence.

It is crucial to understand that totalist movements don't spring from within religious traditions spontaneously. They have social causes, among which are oppression, deprivation, psychological trauma, and prolonged periods of social instability. It's perhaps worth noting that the regions that fit the description of such troubles best, are Muslim.

Groups that act along religious lines to achieve political goals without recourse to violence are, ofcourse, common around the world. These groups usually seek to resolve identifiable social problems. Groups that act along religious lines to achieve political goals through violent means, however, often aim to worsen the varied social and political problems they claim to be acting in opposition to. If there is violence on the ground, they want to accelerate it. If there is discrimination and racial strife, they want to increase it. Members of these groups have concluded, in most cases, that the perpetuation of chaos and injustice is the likeliest, and perhpas the only, way to defeat their opponents.

It's frequently suggested that the best response to various global international terrorist groups is to undertake the aggressive conventional military campaigns to "root them out". This approach, however, runs the risk of playing directly into the hands of the terrorists. Their object is to accelerate whatever social chaos or dislocation they may find in their region or movement, because the greater the chaos, the more likely there are to be aggrieved young men or women to recruit to their cause. War invetably brings suffering, disorder, and rage for these terrorists leaders to exploit and despite what some may tell you, this happens in more places than just Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan. The act of launching a military campaign against a terrorist organisation has been compared, with some justice, to the act of shooting a swarm of bees with a machine gun. The only wounds caused by these bullets are on the skins of those who have done no harm yet have to bury child, or their mother as they swear vengance, thus ensuring a new generation of bees.

Religious extremists distort, quote out of context, and otherwise manipulate their own religious scriptures. The Christian Identity groups in the United States, for instance, conveniently overlook New Testament teachings concerning peace, reconciliation, and brotherhood, and choose to instead to emphasise their own twisted interpretations of the apocalyptic visions of the Book of Revelations anad the law of the Old Testament. The same phenomenon plays out in radical Jewish and Muslim groups around the world.

No major contemporary religious tradition on Earth promotes as an article of faith the killing of innocent people. By the same token, however, no major religious system is arranged in such a way to make it impossible to misinterpret or manipulate its teachings in a destructive way.

So what's the answer to all this?

There is no easy response, no one solution to end it all. The first and most important thing, however, is to understand that holding any single faith responsible for all deeds carried out in its name will only hasten and accelerate a cycle of mutual intolerance (already seen on most discussion threads which we've seen here) and increase the likelihood of new totalist factions. A Christian, is not, by definition a terrorist because some misguided person calling himself a Christian believed that the Bible supported his plot to bomb the 1996 Olympics.

If we focus on the actions of an extremist group affiliated with any given faith, and repeatedly emphasise what we believe to be that one faiths "terrorist" tendencies, we increase the likelihood that rank-and-file members of our faith will come to view all those who believe differently than we do as extremists. This is in fact the aim of many terrorists; to accelerate the polarisation of religious life, and to make it more difficult for people in different faiths to appreciate each other's humanity. I spend most of my time here to make sure that last sentence doesn't come true.

I have seen first hand Muslim boys, angered at how people view them or their religion, nod their heads in acknowledgement to hateful preachment of the West and the "enemies of Muslims". I have seen first hand people declare their hatred for Muslims and their religion based on headlines they've seen in tabloids, and on single Quranic verses cruelly extracted out of context.

Doesn't take much. Does it.

Those who seek to cause harm and destruction, because of their decree of injustice in their homelands or what they perceive to be oppression of others, and who seek to kill you just as much as me just to make our loved ones weep aren't doing so through explosives, they're in fact doing so through the polarisation of our society.

[garywoot]

Overinterpretation embodies itself in a variety of ways, the smallest being organized religion, and the most radical being the jihadist who cite the Qur'An as a valid excuse to carry out their plight against the infidels.

[hancefrank]

hey,
Nice thread I like it.good posting.Very intresting it was.also good information post.

Thanks.

[code1]

hi notify the suites and they will tell you were you can post this,if you are unsure they should be able to direct you